Find a Lawyer

SARAH CONSTRUCTION CO. THROUGH PARTNER, KARACHI versus TAXATION OFFICER-5, AUDIT-2, KARACHI

In the event of failure to provide the taxpayer with the required information or evidence, the decision, based on the information or material available, best evaluates the decision without issuing a notice under Section 121 and 174 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 We can approve. But they could not make arbitrary and irrational estimates of their income principles

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• ASKARI BANK LIMITED v. SHAHI TEXTILES 2013 CLD 672
• Dr. ABDUL AZIZ v. IIND C & FJ/JM SOUTH 2013 YLR 676
• EVERGREEN COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, HINGORJA v. SHAH ABDUL LATIF UNIVERSITY, KHAIRPUR 2013 MLD 681
• GLOBAL ENERGY & COMMODITY EXCHANGE GROUP ITALY SPA (GECX GROUP) v. TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN 2013 CLD 681
• FAROOQ SHAH v. State 2013 PCrLJ 688
• FAHIM AHMAD v. ABID HUSSAIN 2013 YLR 695
• Munshi ABDUL REHMAN LANGAH v. EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE) 2013 PLC(CS) 696
• MUHAMMAD NADEEM v. State 2013 PCrLJ 701

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

famous supreme court advocate from Kalaswala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes