Section 395 the defendant appreciating the evidence and the other witness of the incident supported the prosecution's case by giving details of the incident, both were examined at length, but nothing on the record came in favor of the accused. There is a contradiction in the evidence that the witnesses are minors. The nature was not fatal in the case of the prosecution, such contradictions were natural to come to evidence due to the passage of time between the presence of the incident and the recording of the evidence; Was supported. Contradictions and legal defects in the recovery of identity parades and robbery property, in light of the direct evidence of the robber's charges, did not carry any weight. Was. At the scene of the incident for a long time, his identification could not be mistaken as the prosecutor was able to establish a robbery charge against the accused, without any doubt the trial court's contentious decision to misread or read evidence. Was not the result of, and was being based on. For these reasons, no intervention was needed and in the circumstances, the conviction of the accused was maintained
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
