SHAFQAT HUSSAIN versus NATIONAL TESTING SERVICES PAKISTAN THROUGH CHIEF CO-ORDINATOR/REGIONAL HEAD
Article 199 Constitution Petition Maintenance Examination Re-invoice Sheets Examination was a test taken by the National Testing Service (NTS) and the complaint was that the answers to three questions with the examiner were incorrect, therefore, Wanted to improve the results that the authorities had taken. Cannot evaluate the answer sheet under constitutional jurisdiction The legal questions authorities have on the applicant's representation The correct answers to the two questions, therefore, the possibility of error in answering the third question cannot be ruled out, which is the right of the aggrieved person, Otherwise was eligible to participate. The competitive appointment process cannot be ruled out on a technical basis. The applicant could not properly define the passage of the passage available in the questionnaire and, with constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court chose the wrong answer, refusing to take a detailed review or examination of the answer sheet. Was. Applicants or Responses The request was not interfered with as the key to checking the applicant's results announced by the NTS
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
