Find a Lawyer

SYED SHAHID ALEEM versus MUHAMMAD AKHTAR GILL

Section 12 of the Sindh Chief Court's Rules (O Sections), RR 128, 129 and 130 Special Contract for Sale Contract Suite Agreement allegedly claimed in favor of an incomplete sale by its former buyer. Executed in favor of the contract. Impact against the buyer due to non-payment of the process fee for the issuance of the summons by the claimant The plaintiff had not previously filed a new case against the buyer, although that may have been subject to the limitation before any case against the buyer. In the absence of which the claimant claims against the claim owner. Previously, the buyers were unaware of the plot law and were invalid

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• MUHAMMAD SULEMAN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1051
• NORTHERN POLYTHENE LIMITED (NPL) v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 2013 CLD 1053
• ADNAN KHAN v. ABDUL HAFEEZ 2013 YLR 1057
• Haji ABDUL RASOOL TUNIO v. S.D.O., HESCO, LARKANA 2013 CLC 1064
• KHURSHID ALI JUNEJO v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2013 PLC(CS) 1071
• State v. WAQAR 2013 MLD 1072
• SAIFAL v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1082
• MUHAMMAD ALI v. State 2013 MLD 1085

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

immigration advocate from Faisalabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes