Section 6 436 Defamation of fire or explosives with intent to destroy house, evidence praised as a match stick, while co-accused allegedly resorted to aerial shootings and also injured the complainant's brother. The fact that the fire source, like a matchbox or something else, was preserved and presented to the trial court without the fact that its entirety, including furniture, could be burned with the help of a single match stick. Hostility between the parties regarding a plot of a kerosene or something similar was acknowledged, therefore, the false interference of the accused cannot be ruled out even by such enmity. The suspect had failed to prove the charge against the accused, the suspect had the benefit of the doubt and accordingly was allowed to appeal. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
