On the basis of the reports of detective detectives detaining the evidence of Section 9 (c) and 25 narcotics (Government analysts), 2001, 4 and 5, the police indicated the accused to be in police custody but he escaped. Tried And the escaped suspect was eventually arrested and 18kg of heroin was recovered from the vehicle he was driving, receiving a report of a spy, placing a police packet on the spot, arrival of the suspect's vehicle, weighing 18 There is no contradiction with the heroin recovery. The chemical analysis report is positive for extracting kilograms and samples from each packet because there was no objection that the recovered material was un-sealed or tampered with, therefore, in sending samples. Delays will not affect the outcome of their analysis. Rules 4 and 5 (Government Analyst) Regulation 2001, Drug Control Substance Rules, 2001 were advised and were not required that failure to comply did not state the rules and regulations, he said. Detection, seizure and arrest under the Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997 is an absolute heat and instability regarding the allegations that not all recovered packets were sampled, since each packet did not need to be sampled. Had met. In this case a report was filed with the Property Association of Privateers because the witnesses were not required in the present case, as the CRPC was excluded in drug cases, in which case section 25 Failure to clear the allegations under the Narcotic Substances Act 1997. That relevant time
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
