Find a Lawyer

AMEER BUX ALIAS GHOUS BUX ALIAS GHOUSO BROHI ALIAS SUDHIR BROHI versus STATE

Section (()) (e) and (e) kidnapping for ransom in Kidnapping Trial Court found the accused's affective influence guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment on kidnapping for ransom. However, his presence was spot on. The kidnapping for ransom and kidnapping for ransom cannot be disputed by the evidence of the prosecution's witnesses. Although the prosecution's witnesses could not be dispersed by the defense, the court correctly believed in the trial case, impressed by the trust. Yykurt refused to agree to the definition of evidence by the trial court, the appeal was dismissed in circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• ABDUL QADIR PATEL v. CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER 2013 CLC 1712
• BISMILLAH KHAN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1720
• HILAL TRADING COMPANY v. SWAMI NARAIN TEMPLE ESTATE TRUST BUILDING 2013 CLC 1727
• MORE v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1730
• ABDUL RAUF v. ARY CEMENT LIMITED 2013 CLD 1735
• MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. State 2013 YLR 1745
• ZAFAR HUSSAIN v. State 2013 YLR 1751
• Mst. ASMA AHTESHAM v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1752

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

lawer from fb area from Mingora lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes