Section 23 and 6 (2) (e) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 365 Anti-Terrorism Court Action to Execute Anti-Terrorism Act, Abduction for Payment of Compensation for Compensation between Parties The alleged kidnapper was abducted on the charge of kidnapping for ransom after police recovered him from the FIR, under Section 161 of the alleged abductor statement, CRPC and during the investigation. Other material submitted shows that there was a business between the parties, and the check was issued by the complaining party, Dignity, therefore, Section A of 6565, PC components were not satisfied with the material collected during the investigation, the Anti-Terrorism Act, the 1997 anti should not be hearing cases as common crimes. The terrorist court, rejecting the defendant's plea for transfer of the case, observed himself that three checks were issued by the alleged kidnapper A. nti The terror court had no jurisdiction to hear the present case, on which the request for review was directed to the anti-terrorism court to move the case to the sessions court.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
