Investigation officer not appealed against the 323/34/114 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 417 (2A) against the prosecution's superior, common intention, evidence of the defendant's presence of evidence. The complainant sold his tractor to the co-accused, who had paid only part of the sold price and promised to pay the rest later, the accused stood on the balance of the balance, the complainant alleged. He demanded payment of the rest of the money, which the trial court allegedly encouraged the co-accused to dismiss on the complainant. The complainant was acquitted by a delay of 22 days for filing an FIR, for which no plausible explanation was offered; the complainant did not export any blank in his cross examination. The accused did not repeat the shootings and the complainant did not hurt my words more than the tractor payment, the trial court did not have enough to record the sentence, the Investigation Officer investigated the matter in class. Recommended to be dealt with and stated that the officer was not examined by the prosecution, appeal was dismissed against the situation. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
