Sections 526 and 561 of the Anti Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 and 23 of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 353, 427, 435, 337f (V), 147, 148 and 149 to prohibit civil servant. Assault or criminal power to perform their duties, to cause corruption, to create hostility, to cause mischief, to transfer the case from the Court of Common Purpose Judge Anti Terrorism to satisfactory and to determine whether counter-terrorism. Whether the trial was a trial by a court or a general court, it was necessary to take a look at the allegations made in the FIR court, to ascertain whether the anti-terrorism. Terrorism Act 1997, section 6, 7, had a nexus with the crime of components under 8. In particular, whether the act was an act of terrorism or not, the motive, purpose, design or purpose behind the said act was to be seen and that this act has created a feeling of fear and insecurity among the people. Or the targeting of terrorists in any section of the public or society or any community was inappropriate for the application of these provisions as contained in section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, whose nature, gravity and abhorrence. This cannot be determined without reviewing. In the present case of the alleged crime, the allegations raised in the FIR showed that a mob easily gathered to collect their homeland card, which showed that the police who had gathered to collect There were no planned concerts or plans to attack the public. The homeland card was not equipped with any weapons, except for allegations that they attacked the police party with sticks, due to some delays or mismanagement.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
