Find a Lawyer

SNOWHITE DRY CLEANERS versus SUFIYAN AHMED

Section 46 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O XXXX, Rr 1 and 2 Trademark, Declaration and Violation of the Suit for Permanent Order Prohibition Temporarily Dismissal Order, Plaintiff's acknowledgment that he was named Dry Cleaning Shop has been running and the style of Snow Dry Cleaners since 1949, while the defendant (his former employee) opened the Dry Cleaning Shop using the name Snowshoe Dry Cleaner from April 2011 and the name and the style of the shop are very similar in pronunciation. And thus deceiving the common people. And irreparable harm to the plaintiff The High Court allowed the petition to be stayed until the next date of hearing to prevent the use of the trademark allegedly fraudulent.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• ABDUL GHANI v. GANJ BAKHSH alias GANJOO 2013 YLR 49
• GUL MUHAMMAD v. State 2013 PCrLJ 52
• Mst. JAMILA v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL 2013 MLD 52
• ALLAH WADHAYO v. State 2013 YLR 54
• MUHAMMAD ISSA ABBASI v. ABDUL QADIR 2013 PLD 60
• ABDUL LATIF v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Local Government Department 2013 CLC 63
• SAJJAD NAEEM v. State 2013 YLR 64
• MUHAMMAD NAVEED SHEIKH v. State 2013 PLD 68

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

family advocate from Shahkot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes