MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE QURESHI versus ZAHIR HUSSAIN JAFRI
Section 15 (2 (ii) of the tenant's request for payment of rent for the premises damaged by the landlord was that the landlord's refusal to receive the rent on October and November, 2008 The latter was sent by money order on 27 2008 11 2008. The accuracy of the payment of rent since October 2, 2008 has been fixed by the landlord's lawyer since October 2008, during his evidence the tenant has personally provided to the landlord. On the ground that he was responsible for proving his offer and refusing to receive the same landlord's lawyer through a money order dispute. Copies of the mini-order coupon prepared by the tenant of the tenant did not prove its ownership to the landlord and he refused to receive the same tenant during the cross-inspection that the rent sent by the money order. The month was November, with the tenant failing to prove his rent payment for October, 2008, in his evidence admitting not to issue a notice to the landlord to submit the rent from October. Submission 2008 2008 February February to February 2009 court court in court 2 2 2 2009 on 2009 October, November and December 2008 2008 for fo r The rent was deposited more than sixty days after which the tenant could not change the method of payment of rent without proving the landlord's approval. Receive rent through tender or money order, otherwise its behavior will be considered controversial and act as harassment withdrawal request was accepted in circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
