A. XXXVIII, Rr 5, 6 and the envelope before the decision of section 151 were effective as a prohibited injunction against the defendant by not responding to the interest of any third party and all its implications and effects. Possession was possible OXXIX R 4, to quit such an order under CPC, in addition to insulting on the trial plaintiff's violation of the order of litigation, as well as the request to attach the defendant's property under it. It was excluded from the work given by the defendant that no third party would be of interest. The plaintiff's property concern was that the trial court had recorded in his order that the request was rejected while in fact the decision was made in view of the decision in the decree and for that reason the plaintiff Had to resolve their complaints. The High Court directed that the trial court's appeal be disposed of, according to which the plaintiff's petition was dealt with in favor of Underta.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
