MARI GAS COMPANY LTD. THROUGH ARSHAD IQBAL versus BYCO PETROLEUM PAKISTAN LTD.
OI, R 10 Compulsory and appropriate party, Implementation of a strike based on the purpose of improper and inaccurate enforcement of a party's name The purpose of the suit was to involve the appropriate party in the suit. To avoid being hit, such a person should be concerned that his interest is likely to be affected even if no relief claim was made against him and not extended to the person who was not interested in the proceedings. And does not embrace a person whose common interests are shared with others. Defendants can neither be required nor appropriate parties, and where there is no cause of action against any of the defendants, their name may be excluded from the plaintiff where a person who is a formal defendant in this case Was joined as Neither the requisite party nor the appropriate party nor any relief was sought by the plaintiff against him, his name as the plaintiff may be expelled from the court of the accused even by the name of the defendant himself. Can finish. What was improperly enforced and those against whom no cause of action was shown was the only reason why it was necessary for a person to be a party to the obligation as a result of this action. ?
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
