Find a Lawyer

BAYER CROPS SCIENCE PAKISTAN versus ALTAF HUSSAIN

The AXVI, Rr 1 and 2 witnesses who were not mentioned in the lease for filing the documents for summoning were granted by the Scope High Court finding that the transaction, the nature of the transaction and the evidence in this regard was irrevocable. There must be compensation and, if necessary, a transaction affecting the rights of the parties can be resolved by the preparation of the documents referred to by a witness, if the case is allowed to be reviewed, by the trial court witnesses. Freedom to ask for documents by source.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• Mrs. NAJMA VASEEM ADENWALLA v. Mrs. ABIDA JAWED 2013 CLC 316
• MUHAMMAD BOOTA v. State 2013 PCrLJ 318
• Mrs. RUKHSANA YAHYA v. NAZAZ ALI 2013 YLR 319
• Mrs. SANJEEDA NUSHAT v. Shaikh MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN QURESHI 2013 PLD 320
• Mrs. KANEEZ FATIMA ABRO v. PRESIDENT, ZARAI TARQIATI BANK LTD. 2013 PLC(CS) 324
• ZULFIQAR ALI MUBASHAR v. MUHAMMAD MUMTAZ ALAM 2013 PLD 327
• Mirza ASHFAQ AHMED v. State 2013 YLR 328
• MUHAMMAD KASHIF v. KARACHI DOCK LABOUR BOARD through Chairperson 2013 PLC 329

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

Pakistan, top advocate family court from Chicha watni lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes