Under the License Principle of Mortgage of the Property for Section 58 and 59 Registration Act (XVI of 1908), Section 49 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Section 11 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 54 Prohibition Applicants claim. The defendant had mortgaged the property in his favor and sought to execute the documents in his favor. The defendant claimed that the unregistered mortgage by the plaintiff was a forged document which, apart from being a fake and fabricated document, was also not considered forged and fabricated documents and the same document was not created. Any right or interest in favor of any legitimate property by the plaintiff was proved by the plaintiff and the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant in the cases filed by the plaintiff to the Supreme Court was taken by the plaintiff. The main defense was that the death complex / suit property was held in mortgage by him and he was occupying it in his capacity, not as a resident and tenant, whose position cannot be proved. The findings regarding the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant have already been finalized and the judiciary's theory was also attracted. He could not prove his case and did not deserve relief in any way as claimed. His suit dismissed the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
