Article 18 (b) (ii) and 32 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), OI, R 10 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Confession of Constitution Petition No charge of proceedings initiated under the Private Complaint National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 Could handle And on the effect of independent representation in such proceedings, the petitioner asked the Bench of the High Court to stop taking drastic action against the officers of NAB and a complaint was initiated by the complainant bank on a private complaint. An attempt was made to undo the action. As a respondent to Section 18 (b) (iii) of the Ordinance, the proceedings show that the NAB chairman or an officer was authorized by the chairman to initiate proceedings against any person upon receipt of the complaint. But the whole ordinance gave the complainant no right to take charge of the EF initiated by the Chairman NAB or to represent the EF in this case. Except for the reference given by the Chairman NAB under the authority, Permission was not allowed The National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 provided for the right to appeal, reflecting that the complainant was not granted any right of appeal, and even in those cases which were initiated on the basis of a private complaint. , The right of appeal was exclusively granted to the Chairman. The NAB or the Criminal High Court held that the National Accountability Ordinance 1999 was limited to its application only to the complainant who was granted the right to appeal under the Bank's ordinance request.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
