On the basis of the affidavit made under O VII, R 11, O XXIII, R 1 & O XXXVII, Rr 2 & 3 later on O XXXII, the CCC petitioned the civil court under O VII, R 11, CPC. Filed after withdrawing the previous case from the retracting of the previous case, the defendant dismissed the post-trial case without obtaining permission from the court, dismissing the case by the trial court, OXXII, Banned under R1 (3), the CPC's validity plaintiff was not able to defend and defend the case presented thereafter without obtaining leave from the trial court, as was usual with others. Civil suit The step-hearing O VII, R 11, could not decide the defendant's request under CPC, when the request for leave was granted to defend the subsequent case. The plaintiff's request under O XXIII, R 1, CPC was to withdraw the earlier case and file a fresh summary case, which was accepted by the civil court, showing that the plaintiff had sufficient reasons for E's return. Earlier suit by the plaintiff was not unconditional by the plaintiff, therefore, he would be able to file a case thereafter, rejecting the unspecified order, and directed the trial court to direct the case thereafter. To make the decision at the specified time in accordance with the law.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
