Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus MST. KOKAB BENAZIR FATIMA

Sections 12, 25 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OVII, R II suit, show that the plaintiff's claim in a lawsuit for specific performance of the contract, permanent injunction and special damages shows that the execution After the timely sale agreement, the plaintiff himself was not sure that the suit property was clear and invested with all the legal options to prosecute the plaintiff so that he could convey the ownership to the claimant, Failed to make itself clear that the defendant made a mistake. Whether or not he had the powers to convey the suit property, he himself was to be found guilty, and none of the existing defendants was, nor was, capable of executing a contract relating to the shares of the other defendants in the suit property. ? The other defendants invested with any power to act on their behalf and to dispose of their shares in the suit property but in the circumstances the suit could not succeed II, R II, CPC was allowed and the plaintiff was dismissed. Was online advocate from Kamokey lawyer