Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RASHID versus STATE

According to the Section 497 Preventive Regulation (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, the Central Investigator's Grant, the FIR, the victim's eyes were shot and the aforesaid injury resulted in the death of the accused. The arm was recovered. The star witnesses implicated him in his statements under section 161, CRPC and section 164, not the CRPC complainant who filed the report on the notice, but the eyewitness of the incident requested. The defendant / accused was not charged with firing or being equipped with a TT pistol; he only stated that he was present with the Central Investigation Officer, who mentioned in the challan that the applicant. There is no evidence against the defendant except that he was cheated on the spot, pointing to a joint intention to appear on the spot. The applicant / accused was not charged with any crime and the accused was not charged by the prosecutor for keeping Mans Rika in the same way, the case of the applicant / accused is further investigated which the accused is guaranteed. The conditions were accepted best advocate from Killa Abdullah lawyer