Find a Lawyer

ISRAR AHMAD versus STATE

Section 9 (c) witnesses, including an excise inspector complaining about the value of the evidence, were in the form of a bundle of 14 kilograms of plastic in connection with the recovery of 14 kilograms of hash from the accused, improving the evidence of each of the policemen. Can be understood Evidence from other independent witnesses, who had no conviction against the accused, evidence of the recovery of marijuana in such large quantities from the accused was not harmed despite a lengthy scrutiny of the prosecution's witnesses, the trial court has just said. Also depended on the recovery of only two kilograms. The marijuana that was sent to the Chemical Examiner for report and the marijuana was found, and it benefited the defendant in connection with the remaining twelve kilograms of marijuana fines and the conviction of the accused. list of supreme court advocates from Goular Khel lawyer