Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAJEEB versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE PAK SECRETARIAT, RAWALPINDI

Sections 15B, 34, 272 and 273 of the Specific Relief Act (of 1877), Sections 42 and 55 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AX Exxon, RR1 and 2Application AXX, RR1 and Under section 2, the plaintiff, who was a member of the Board of Constituents, filed a Order in the Declaration, Order and Damage Trial under the Special Relief Act, 1877, read with the CPC Had directed the Federation of Pakistan and the Cantonment Board to take office. The plaintiff's case was open and handed over to the plaintiff and prevented from taking any adverse action directly or indirectly against the plaintiff and in his office at the premises of the Cantonment Board Office not to be disturbed in the performance of his duties and further requested that the board Contempt of court against the chief executive officer / violation of a court-approved order should have led to legal proceedings and proof of issue was required. Filing a case of eligibility charges and denial in relation to a complex question means that the plaintiff holds a charge or office papers, as well as an inquiry from an office where the plaintiff was fired. Cannot be endorsed by a single document, which may prove that he was expelled or violated or disobeyed, for the first time, the issuance of a show cause notice Was and should be charged and action should be taken. Separately, according to the law, since the plaintiff had to give full details and was sent by someone else, with a particular date and time, criminal advocate from Khuiratta lawyer