SHAKAR DIN versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY SINDH, KARACHI
O VII, R 11 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), clause 42 and 55 The plaintiff's dismissal of the plaintiff scope was, in the present case, licensing for a particular period, but was not extended, because no one in that regard The new order was not issued. Extended plaintiffs, for example, no rights, titles and legal roles, had no standing and no cause of action, for filing the present case for declaration and injunction, even on a certain date of settlement, yielded conclusive results. Can't be done. Further, since damages cannot be claimed, because the plaintiff did not occupy a particular date, as such application was moved under OVII, R 11, CPC was permitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Thatta lawyer
