Find a Lawyer

AL-NOOR FERTILIZER INDUSTRIES LTD versus PROVINCE OF SINDH

The plaintiff's claim for claimant's claim was that he was the owner of one hundred acres of Barani un-surveyed land and because of his continuous occupation of the land, he was allotted the land and said that the land was There is a huge amount of money to make fit. The purpose of the farming was that the plaintiff denied the claims of the claimants that the plaintiffs were in unauthorized possession of the land, while it was allotted, unanimous view of both courts in light of the evidence presented on record with supporting documentation. It was held that the defendant with respect to the land was different from the claimant's possession, the allotment in favor of the plaintiffs was never challenged by the defendant and the plaintiff had not raised any objection to the allotment of land to the plaintiff. The complaint was that the defendant was trying due to incorrect measurement and delimitation of the valid allotment order. Their possession of the piece of land granted to them under the Allotment Order was sufficient proof that the plaintiffs' land was the same in their possession and which was different from the land in which the defendant occupied. In the absence of enough ground to put aside the conclusions of the two courts, below, they were retained. best law firms from Village Sunder lawyer