Find a Lawyer

CH. BARKAT ALI versus AL-ZAMIN LEASING MODARABA

Sections 9, 10 and 22 of the High Court have admitted to the appellant for defending the appellant that the case was filed by the bank to recover the loan amount at the time the loan documents were signed, and this case After dismissing the petition for leave to defend, the banking court ruled in favor of the appellant-created bank player that their signatures on the loan documents were obtained by the lenders through fraud. Had received. Knowing the contents of the correct document, he could not place his signature at six places and consequently took a turn. That such documents were obtained by his employees through fraud and fraud, and the appellant did not even bother to submit a leave application to defend the case under his signatures or the bank. He did not even speak on his oath to deny the allegations. The Banking Court, while passing its judgment and decree, conducted the test with justice, in defense of the appellant and rightly concluded that the appellant was allowed to defend the suit in favor of any defensible defense. Was not granted, but in view of the plaintiff's acknowledgment of the applicant's signature on the letter of guarantee as well as the other documents on record, the suit was also a division bench of the High Court refused to interfere with the decision and the banking The order passed by the court in favor of the bank was dropped on appeal grounds famous supreme court advocate from Gakhar Mandi lawyer