Sections 47 and AXXI, R58 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), executing Articles 42 and 39 declaring the sale / investigation of claims and annulment of other documents were announced, following which, during the execution proceedings, There was a writ for occupation. Issued in favor of the plaintiff's application under O XXI, Rule 58, the CPC dismissed the inquiry into the right to the land subject to the decree. Defendant / Applicant's position was that he was the absolute owner of the aforesaid video sale in favor of the work accuracy plaintiff / applicant acknowledged that the required sale process was canceled and before the record of the revenue Entries were also canceled, pending the decision of the appellate court administrators, either of the defendants / applicants. The alleged sale deed did not even challenge the cancellation of the sale deed or the registration of the revenue record. The trial court and the appellate court could not change their address. GS based on the assumption that the entry and sale agreement on the revenue records was wrongly canceled because the scope of the case was not open to provide such relief as any of the orders of the courts below review Illegal interference was not excluded.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
