O VII, R 11 For the claim and acquittal of the case, Reese Judsta's rejection, the applicant's rule was simultaneously rejected on the basis that the first case filed by the plaintiff on the same subject was affirmed. The plaintiff has previously filed a case. The merit was dismissed and the plaintiff subsequently filed the present case six years later because of the same action, which was affected by the principle of the Res Judesta Court, while considering the application under O. VII, Rule 11, c. The PC was also supposed to examine the plaintiff and inspect and examine the non-controversial and recognized material that may be available on the record by the parties. The plaint was rightly rejected. The amendment was rejected.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
