SIKANDAR ALI versus SHO POLICE STATION, B SECTION KHAIRPUR
Articles 22A, 22B and 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 337H (2), 148, 149 and 114 attempt to do a fine job, injured by haste or negligence, deadly weapons. Armed riots, unlawful assembly, corruption cases when plea for re-investigation, pending trial of the accused and co-accused were pending in the house of the complainant and Fired at them. The petition for transfer of the case to the accused under Sections 22A and 22B, CCPC, was not considered before the Justice of the Peace for the re-examination of the case, but the prosecution was dismissed as the prosecution claims that the accused. Alibi's plea before the trial court is at liberty to protest. And at the present stage, re-investigation of the matter was not permissible under the law as the complaining party's case would also face prejudice. The accused accused of legitimacy did not question the order of the magistrate who confessed to it. Despite the fact that if a party has a complaint against the magistrate's order on the police report under Sections 170 and 173, the law resolves it, the CC accused demanding the exclusion / release of the case. There was a hearing before the court. The law and if the accused finds himself entitled to be acquitted, he can refer to the trial court, which was capable of approving such an order, so, if re-investigation is allowed, no useful purpose is presented. Can be, in the situation
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
