Find a Lawyer

NIAZ AHMED DAYO versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, LAHORE

Explained by the removal of the R4 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), the removal of Section 4 service appellant, who has served twenty-two years and has a record record of serving as a senior engineer. Was removed from the job after issuing a letter of. On the recommendation of Chairman WAPDA at higher rates, who responded to the appellant's issuing authority's show notice, he denied all the allegations leveled against him, the record said. Has disclosed that prior to issuing a letter of explanation to the appellant, the preliminary inquiry was conducted by the appellant against the appellant, but the appellant asserted that the inquiry was unrelated, and that no one to inspect it. Opportunity not granted, despite appellant's denial of serious allegations on the fact that regular proceedings against him Otherwise the objections were not made otherwise the evidence of the preliminary inquiry was to collect the evidence and determine the truth of the allegations made against the employee. Yes, the authority did not feel the need to conduct regular investigations against the appellant. And only the preliminary investigation proceedings reported by the authority were banned for imposing a fine, which resulted in the removal of the applicant from the job which could not be protected by an anonymous order. And the case has been directed to the authority to reinstate the appellant and the same charges / charges have a duration of four months. list of supreme court advocates from Kot Ghulam Mohd lawyer