TOUSEEF AHMED MALIK versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Appeal against dismissal of section 3, 10 11 and 12 Government Employees (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1973, R4 (1) (b) (iv) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 A disciplinary action against the driver was initiated. Issuing a showcase notice to him, his personal hearing on March 13, 2001 under the Rules of Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973, when the Service (Special Powers) was removed from the Ordinance, under section 11 and Already 20,00 was implemented. The Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 12 of 2000, on any other rules, the proceedings against the appellant under the Public Employees (Discipline and Discipline) Rules 1973 were illegal, invalid and invalid. Was the use. On the basis of the same allegations contained in the law and its remand notice, remand for the de novo action against the appellant was strictly pursuant to the relevant law, the service will be reinstated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Mastoi lawyer
