TAYYAB HUSSAIN QURESHI versus CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BORAD OF REVENUE
RR4 (1) (b) (iv) and 5 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Appeal for discharge from service by issuing a job and inquiring against the allegations of inquiry against them. Was imposed on the appellant. A detailed inquiry report presented by the inquiry officer appellant on the gross misconduct revealed all the allegations leveled against the appellant that he had been summoned for personal hearing while riding on the bed. On the other hand, after the authorities were in a position to travel, he requested a further date, on the other hand, he stated that the appellant was called to a personal hearing on four occasions and each time When he failed to keep this statement, no contradiction was made by him. Regarding the appellant's effect, authorities made every effort to provide the appellant with a reasonable opportunity to defend himself and could not wait indefinitely to decide the case, appellant in support of his conviction. Failed to provide sufficient evidence, his appeal was rejected
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Nooriabad lawyer