MUHAMMAD SHAKEEL versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL INTELLIGENCE BUREAU AND ANOTHER
Section 3, 5 and 10 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Implementation of Section 4 Service Compulsory Retirement Fines Applicant must serve on the charge sheet and after his inquiry, his retirement from service. Was fined a huge fine. In addition to being in the Intelligence Bureau, money was also recovered from another harassed citizen and through coercion and blackmail when the inquiry committee started proceedings, appellant was detained when a criminal case against him took place. When I was arrested, the appellant's lawyer predicted his case on three important grounds. ; (A) Poor inquiry process. (b) discrimination in punishment; and (c) no criminal case against the appellant was pending, the number of sick cases appeared in the inquiry report, for example, the chairman of the inquiry committee himself admitted that the inquiry He recorded the statements of the appellant / accused and the witnesses. Wherever the admission by the inquiry officer in the appellant's argument admits that the removal of the inquiry service (special powers) from the ordinance was not done in the specific manner of section 5 (1) (c). , 2000 provided that the Inquiry Officer or the Inquiry Committee shall inquire into the allegations and may examine oral or documentary evidence which may be deemed necessary and the accused may testify against him in support of or accusing the accused. Will be entitled to check. In the light of section 5 (1) (c) of the Ordinance, the appellant had the right to inspect the witnesses, but this mandatory requirement was not taken into account during the proceedings of the inquiry.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
