Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMED KHAN versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Section 9 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Transfer and Appellant's selection grade was refused to go to the next grade when it reached the maximum of its scale in BS 12 and Selection grade (BS) was also rejected. 16) On the basis that his ACR gave negative remarks for the relevant year, the reporting officer stated in his observation that the \ appellant was intelligent and interested in his employment. He has been advised to understand the knowledge of E&M tasks \ The counseling officer stated in his estimation of appellant's performance that he was an experienced sub-engineer who needed more interest in his job, a grading average \ Said that no action was taken by both the reporting officer and the counseling officer to identify the specific area in which the appellant, in his opinion, was deficient and needed improvement. There was no consultation from his superiors on which he did not pay. Any carefully noted remarks in Appellant's ACR should be treated as advisory in nature and cannot be considered "negative" remarks and transfer case should be raised on the issue of transfer and accordingly the selection. Grade should be taken. The data will be considered by the department for granting selection grade to the appellant at the next meeting of the authorized publicity committee. e His juniors were given a selection grade \ r \ n pakistani advocates Murree lawyer