MUHAMMAD JAVED AKHTAR versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, HOUSING AND TOWN PLANNING AGENCY, LAHORE
Section 2 (g) and Section O1 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Charges The applicant's complaint was that he was employed on the basis of work charge in 1981 and worked till primary fax 30 6 2005. But it was not served. Regularized validity was held, even though there was no concept of a person receiving work indefinitely, for almost a period of almost 20 years no one was conceived on the basis of charge of service work. Maybe, the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Order) was a permanent, applicant employed in the 1968 ordinance against the job, which had been going on for more than 9 months, the High Court directed the authorities. Issue appropriate orders to regulate applicant services in the grade in which he is applying.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Lahore lawyer