ASLAM MASIH ALIAS KALA MASIH versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE PATTOKI, DISTRICT KASUR
Sections 423 and 439 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 377 Sessions Court, on appeal, obtained the remand of the case after setting aside the conviction and conviction of the accused by the trial court so that the victim could be examined. The witness was not examined by the trial. The court was required to make a fair decision as it was capable of recording its statement under section 232323 CR PC read with the affected section 42323 CR PC and covered aspects of the marriage and areas of such jurisdiction. One case was to be sent to court. An injunction was directed to investigate the victim. The purpose of the trial was to rectify the trial court's errors such as denial of evidence, avoid abortion or failure of justice, and provide more opportunity for the parties. Turning to the case, where the failure of justice was noted by the appellate court's order was not a second trial for the same offense, the preliminary results of the trial were held by the Sessions Court. The impeachment order did not cause any prejudice to the accused, it would be in favor of liberty to advance their version during the trial during the trial, evidence would be supported by the trial court. Dismissal request for judgment to be decided on merit rejected with same observation \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Ukba lawyer