Find a Lawyer

NOOR AHMAD ALIAS MALU versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) / 34 34 Definition of Evidence Failure to prove motive was not a decisive factor in the murder case, however, much of the prosecution's testimony was that the defendant's motive was to cause the victim's death. He was married to his sister. Failure to prove the circumstances of his consent had raised serious suspicion in the prosecution's story, the complainant's statement in connection with the attack on the accused, failed to obtain necessary evidence, a prosecution witness who was Patwari and He had planned the site, only showed the presence of two suspects at the time of the incident, but the other co-accused stopped appearing, the witness was a lightheaded, while the other related site plan In the way that created the suspicion of the fact that the witness said. Neither the complainant nor the other witnesses of the site visited the site, nor did other statements of the prosecutor say that the prosecutor's witness claimed that he had seen 4/5 vacant matters on the spot. , But no vacancy was recovered by the investigating officer, absence of report of forensic science laboratory, recovery of weapons of crime, could not be credited. The record indicated that property disputes were ongoing in the families of the accused and the prosecution witnesses who were all close relatives, and the presence of a deadly enmity with some other people, including relatives, some village notices, investigations. Appeared before the officer and stated that the accused persons were innocent evidence of prosecution, in these circumstances the credibility and credibility of the two CC accused inheritance advocates near Kahuta lawyer