Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BAKHSH versus FARAZA

The declaration of the effect of the Property Act (section 1882 of I82), section 118 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), sections 42 and 54 of the suit and declaration of a permanent injunction plaintiff claiming possession of the suit land. Set the case for He was the owner of the suit and in exchange for the suit in favor of the defendant, the conversion was illegal and ineffective, the defendant's rights, with the request of the permanent injunction, the defendant claimed that the suit on the basis of the exchange The land is owned by the owner. And its statement was filed by the Revenue Officer that the Validity Plaintiff was able to prove that he was the owner of the suit land and that the conversion was not affected by the fact that the transfer The change to was maintained under the revenue distribution. Authorities, there was no room for the plaintiff's suit to be improper and the appeal against the proper verdict was preferred and the injunction was dismissed. No false reading or failure to read evidence was identified by any court. Did not commit illegal or material misconduct that was identified below. The court's finding below was unthinkable. law firms from Amangarh lawyer