Find a Lawyer

AZIZ-UR-REHMAN versus STATE

Section 302 (b) testimony testimony Benefits of doubt The witnesses, the victim's son, who was a witness on the occasion of the confession, specifically stated that the accused had only fired one shot, but according to a post-mortem report, the victim was identified as his own person. But there were three injuries. The presence of witnesses at the time of the incident was, thus, suspicious about the time of the victim's death, with the number of witnesses injured and the number of witnesses in the inquiry report, as well as in the post-mortem report. Was. The prosecution's version could not be retained solely on the conviction of the accused, when the presence of eyewitnesses was not established at the relevant time, the benefit of the doubt was extended to the accused in the circumstances and accordingly he was acquitted. Was. lawer from fb area from Naseerabad lawyer