Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZAM versus JUDGE, ANTI-TERRORISM COURT, FAISALABAD

Article 19 (3) By taking the direct knowledge of a case through the purpose and procedure of the Anti-Terrorism Court, the Anti-Terrorist Court may take a trial directly, without trial, under Section 9090 90 of the Magistrate. , Shipped under CRPC objective. Section 19 (3) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 has to pass the said procedure, under which, under section 173, the challan / report is first presented to the concerned magistrate, who after examining the facts, section 190 Submitted under CRPC. The matter is referred to the court of competent jurisdiction. If this is not a trial by then, the special courts established under the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 have been given jurisdiction to take this matter directly. Is. Before them, either through a police challan or a private complaint, it is disclosed that the commission of the crime has been disclosed in the jurisdiction of the said Act and the Special Court has been informed by the Sec. has been given. 9 (3) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 does not mean that it has the authority to conduct cases from different police stations, and the agency has been instructed to present a challan after adding scheduled offenses because the facts of this case. Reveals. Criminal commission special judges cannot even approve such orders even when reading newspapers reading news, because they do not have the autonomous authority or jurisdiction to do so. female advocates from Rawalpindi lawyer