Find a Lawyer

MST. RUQIA BATOOL versus STATE

Article 5 B5B / 9209/202020/8 (8/11 Article Constitution Pakistan (1973)), Termination of Article 199 FIR Constitutional Petition The dispute between the accused party and the complainant was disputed by the lady. Confessed to her marriage with the partner and refused to enter into any other contents of the marriage contract, both the accused confessed as husband and wife and the complainant had entered into the FIR through the complainant. It was also stopped where both the accused and the complainant had disputed their alleged marriage, which could be resolved only by family court when the accused In the case of Adi's credibility, the fact of the marriage between the parties could be ascertained and such a matter should not have been taken to the criminal court, as the criminal court had to decide on the validity of the related marriage question and Was unable to declare which marriage suit was appropriate for the family? Ruling on the affected FIR was nothing but disappointment and malpractice by the complainant, which put the accused under pressure. And to transform and transform a marital affair into a criminal matter in order to break their illicit relationship. Was enormous. Continuation of FIR will be equivalent to misuse of law enforcement FIR has been canceled attorney vs advocate vs counsel from FR Peshawar lawyer