GULZAR AHMED versus MUHAMMAD INAYAT ULLAH
The Section 12 Contract Act (IX of 1872), the Section 55 suit for specific performance of the contract, claimed that the defendant had given full consideration but refused to enforce the contract and did not dispute the execution of the contract and the receipt of the balance. The defendant simply refused to receive the balance. The possession of the money suit was conveyed to the plaintiff, but the full payment of the suit by the plaintiff could not be proved, in the circumstances, could not be dismissed because there was nothing in the record to show that the time was right for the contract. The essence was Accordingly, with a fine of Rs 25,000, the High Court directed the payment of an additional amount of Rs.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Minchanabad lawyer
