Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HASHIM versus STATE

Testimony of Section 426 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 (b) / 149, 324/149 and 336/149 of the two suspended prosecution witnesses who each suffered two minor injuries, including five. Five of them were involved. The same accused was acquitted on the basis of the same evidence, the allegations against the accused were common in nature. Medical evidence, the first jurist, was not in accordance with the prosecution's version. Reconsideration and re-evaluation are essential. The accused has already been convicted for more than a year and a half and his appeal is unlikely to be heard in the near future, the two accused accused of similar roles had already been granted bail by the High Court. The sentence was suspended and he was granted bail in the circumstances patent advocate from Besham lawyer