MUHAMMAD MOHIUDDIN versus SINDH PRIVATIZATION COMMISSION
Miscellaneous judicial application by the bidder before the Auction High Court of the land by Sections 3, 27 and 28 Privatization Commission was not constituted by any special court High Court through Commission Maintenance Sindh Privatization Commission Ordinance 2001. During the Sindh Privatization Commission Ordinance, 2001, a procedure using the civil jurisdiction would probably be followed by the procedure provided in the CPC, and the procedure for the summary of the matter relating to the facts of the case followed. Provided that in O XXXVII, the procedure for filing a regular case with the CPC cannot be reached. Such judicial miscellaneous applications were not a viable principle because of the implementation of the CPC
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Taunsa sharif lawyer
