GOL MARKET, CLOTH MERCHANTS, WELFARE SOCIETY, LIAQUATABAD THROUGH PRESIDENT versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT THROUGH CITY NAZIM
There was a dispute between the plaintiffs for declaration and injunction with respect to the provisions of 54 & Su 54 suit property, the defendants believed that they were the tenants of this suit property, jointly in the name of the defendants. I was submitting. It was told before the court that it was not going to forcibly expel the defendants, but would proceed with the legal claimant, in view of the plaintiff's lawyer's statement of the plaintiff's lawyer, who had said that Is the purpose of Acquired, will not pressurize suit is excluded because there is no pressure with requests
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
