Find a Lawyer

MST. AISHA versus MRS. SAMAR AFROZE

Article 15 (2) (ii) and 18 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The original owner of the premises that gifted the premises in question to the respondent for a change in the premises of default premises in payment of rent. It was reported that the transfer notice was not only presented to the tenant, but also the original owner had told the tenant that after the receipt of the information and notice of the matter, the new owner was not given the premises rent. Was, after serving notice of the transfer under Section 18 of the Impact Sindh, the tenant Premises Ordinance, 1979, the tenant had to pay the rent of the house within 30 days to the new landlord and not the old landlord to the former landlord. Submitting rent to the court in the name of was not a valid tender of the rent after the new landlord. Providing notice under section 18 of the Sindh Tenant Compensation Ordinance, 1979, the two courts, in the payment of rent for the premises, had properly approved the eviction order against the tenant, irrespective of any kind In the absence of legal intervention or irregularities, the orders of the courts cannot be interrupted by the High Court under the Constitutional jurisdiction. best law firm from Narang Mandi lawyer