Find a Lawyer

JABEBS (PVT.) LIMITED versus PRESIDING OFFICER, SINDH LABOUR COURT NO. V

Section 62 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Bonus and Recovery Receipts etc.: Respondents, who were removed from employment, filed a petition for service rehabilitation, the Applicants filed the section on Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002. 62 also moved the petition. Under the settlement agreement between the collective bargaining agent and the employer, the issue of recovery of bonuses and increments, etc., was taken up by the employer because after the settlement has been settled, the rehabilitation process will be terminated. The settlement filed for the enforcement of the terms was not enforceable in law, the interstate petition filed by the applicant / employer after being rejected by the Labor Court, the Constitution to dismiss the defendant's recovery process Was filed under section 62 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002 Services were provided quickest treatment. Settlement under the aforesaid section of the Labor Court to recover its liabilities under the Settlement Procedure under Section 62 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, or the decisions or decisions of any arbitrator, Labor Court or High Court respondent Finding recovery claims arising out of the nature of the execution proceedings in 2002, service of notice was not required under Section 46 of the Ordinance and under Section 62 of the Ordinance the applicant / employer was reasonably confident that the settlement. At the end of the period I mentioned, the respondent could not demand its implementation. Any of its terms were terminated, as Article 62 (2) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2002 provided that best advocate from Chowk Maitla lawyer