Find a Lawyer

NIB BANK LIMITED versus APOLLO TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED

Section 19 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), AXXI, R 66 Implementation of the decision with or without the intervention of the court, the mode of execution on the declaration of the scope suit decision and the court's order itself changes the process of execution. The court will have the power to adopt any mode of implementation of the decree when the court or financial institution once chose to supply O XXI, CPC later through auction proceedings and press news. Could not refrain from its explicit clauses regarding the issuance of the notice; the duty of the court was to protect the rights of the judgment. The borrower will try to bring about fair value through the sale of his property and refrain from selling it on pricing principles.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• Mst. SAMINA AFFAQ v. MUHAMMAD JABBAR 2013 YLR 1387
• MAZHAR ALI v. State 2013 YLR 1392
• MUHAMMAD HASSAN v. SHAMSUDDIN 2013 MLD 1392
• Mst. HINA v. MUHAMMAD TARIQUE 2013 YLR 1394
• ANWAR KHATAB v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1398
• YAHYA v. AFTAB NATHANI 2013 MLD 1401
• ABDUL AZIZ MYSOREWALA v. MANVADAR SADARGH MEMON JAMAT 2013 YLR 1405
• SULEMAN alias SALOO v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1406

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Dudial lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes