Sections 202 and 206 of the Specific Relief Act (of 1877), Articles 42 and 56, which demand the declaration that the power of attorney's cancellation instrument in favor of the plaintiff be the principal of the agency holding the invalid and unlawful Announcement of cancellation of agent The power of attorney's claim was that the power of attorney was in his favor, so it could not be ruled out. The correct admission point was that any case against the execution of the Power of Attorney was not approved even if the plaintiff's case went to trial. It was acknowledged as well, yet it acted as an agent only, no doubt in those cases where the agent was interested in the property, which was the subject of the agency, then the agency was called the agent. Damages cannot be canceled. Unless the interest is provided in the contract itself, however, this was not the case as the plaintiff had no interest in the matter. The agency had no interest in the subject matter of the agency as a plaintiff, and as such, the power of attorney could not be dismissed at any time in the current suit without consideration of any cause for action. But such a cancellation will not be valid for a pre-entered transaction. The agent shall be available only to a third party prior to such termination, and the cause of action for the particular execution of such transaction in favor of which such power has been exercised or interest is awarded. The plaintiff had no reason to take action, therefore, the plaintiff was dismissed, under circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
