HAJI MUHAMMAD SULEMAN KHAN versus AHMAD NOOR
OI, R 9 Qunun e Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts 117 and 118 suits, based on the evidence based on the burden of proof required by the parties' false jester effect, the plaintiff claimed that the property in the dispute was owned and inherited. ? The defendant was given free or rent for 30 years and the onus was on the plaintiffs to prove that they had the title of suit land vest but they failed to refuse the disclosure of the plaintiff's statement. It revealed that some of the co-owners of the disputed property did not apply as a party to the original case that the absence of all the co-owners in the title-based ownership claim was fatal to the case. Was not, the criminal complaint filed by one of the defendants was adopted by the defendant in which the accused It was alleged that the defendants had in fact violated the suit land. Under certain circumstances, the appellant's appeal was rightly accepted by the appellate court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Shangla lawyer