Find a Lawyer

PUNJAB PROVINCE THROUGH SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, FOOD DEPARTMENT versus SHEIKH ZIA-UD-DIN

Section 42 Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, (XXVIII of 1958), Sections 4 and 30 of the West Pakistan Civil Rental Ordinance (VII 1959), Section 13 suit declaration for eviction property allotment order by the plaintiff. The challenged trial court dismissed the case after finding the allotment order because the appellate court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal, arguing that the plaintiff was a tenant under the plaintiff, which sought the provisions of the West Pakistan Citizens' Rent Restriction Ordinance. May demand his dismissal, in 1959 the allotment was approved by the Validity Chief Settlement Commissioner. Under the remand order of the M Court, the validity of the allotment order was examined by the High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction and finally by the Supreme Court and it was found that the plaintiff had never applied for transfer of property and the plaintiff. Had knowledge of the allotment order and admitted it. The tenant ug defendants were based on separate judgment and decree-based evidence and the correct definition of law and facts from the process of law as a plaintiff as a plaintiff. High Court dismissed the request for review. registration advocate from Mohmand lawyer